Beliefs, Actions, Reality, and the Implications Surrounding Them
People tend to be focused on whether or not they could do something that they don’t stop to think if they should. Whether it’s from the The Secret or from motivational speakers, it has been that, when supported by action, beliefs can create and manifest reality, that concept that’s argued could make people lead to greatness. However, as inspiring and uplifting as this may be, it has its flaws, two of which I’ll disclose. One is that beliefs have this annoying tendency to override logic (especially if it’s an uncomfortable truth). The second has more horrifying implications: Since reality can be manifested by beliefs through actions, this also means that beliefs can be built from lies.
One might ask “How can lies manifest reality if actions don’t drive the belief?” The answer is that lies work similar to affirmations, only through dishonesty: A person can repeat a lie a certain number of times (It can be a hundred, it can even be a thousand), no matter how absurd the lie may be, and some listener will believe it as if it was fact and truth. This is more pronounced with authority figures; if a person of authority (it can be someone who’s a doctor, a principal, a manager at a job, a CEO, A boss at a job, etc.) tell their workers a lie, the people under them will be more likely to believe it. For one example, there’s the Holocaust: In the 1940s, the American Newspapers (controlled by Jews; Americans didn’t know it at the time) wrote headlines that Germany killed six millions Jews under Hitler (this lie spread before World War 2 even began), and the viewers believed took sympathy for the Jews. In reality, less Jews were killed. The Jews told a false narrative of themselves being victims and they weaponized it. Another example is the September 11 attacks: The Jew-owned News Media told their viewers that Arabs from Afghanistan and Iraq attacked the Twin Towers with their planes. Thousands of people who watched the News believed it without too much question since it’s told from an authoritative source. The Truth is that they were framed by Israeli Mossad agents and it was actually a controlled demolition; additionally, Jews who worked at the Twin Towers were told not to enter the on that day, sparing them as well. Thousands of gentile were killed, several Mossad agents who witnessed the event danced without remorse, and American troops were duped into fighting Afghanistan and Iraqi soldiers for Jewish causes.
Is this the reason certain people lie even to themselves? Either way, it certainly paves the way for dogmatic dictatorships, especially in the Communist empires or the Christian/Islamic empires in the past. While the concept obviously had a noble intentions, its gentile champions and advocates didn’t fully foresaw the detriments, let alone how it could be tooled up as a weapon. The Jews, however, have done so and they’ve discussed about and brainstormed it in secret. One example is optimism; normally, optimism is meant to maintain a positive attitude and its complexities is that it acknowledges uncomfortable truths and negative emotions. Weaponized optimism, however, ignores the concerns of the latter two attributes and forces people into compliance regardless of choice. The biggest takeaway here is that even non-material things like love, compassion, hope, trust, gate-keeping and (as mentioned above) victimhood can be weaponized; when concepts are turned into a weapon, nothing is safe from exploitation, not even things people consider sacred and dear, and it is one of the reasons Jews are ruthlessly cunning.
Wasn’t there a Bible verse that have people’s swords being turned against them? I know it’s not literal, but it’s an accurate analogy, even if it’s portrayed in a disturbing light.
Comments
Post a Comment