The Idiot, or the Dogmatist?

Written: April 24, 2026

 

Recently, a thought entered my head, and it wsa something worth writing down. Who is the more frustrating of the two types of people? The idiot, or the Dogmatist? For me, I thought it was stupid and ignorant people for a long time,. I bet a large number of people reading this thought the same as well. However, I'm starting to realize that the dogmatist are the worst of the two.

The idiot doesn't know what he's doing, and for it, he's condemned by the audience/crowd/witnesses. However, the idiot has room to learn, provided he's not indoctrinated. The amount and scope of mistakes an idiot can make are limited. The same thing cannot be said for Dogmatists.

The dogmatist is one of the most frustrating types of people to ever argue with. They're convinced they're right, regardless of different perspectives/testimonies and evidence proving otherwise. Even more vexing is that, should they put in effort to set out and prove something and succeed, it doesn't just support their beliefs, but it actually feeds and perpetuates the dogma. By this logic alone, the dogmatist walks right into the Fallacy of Coherence (a well-constructed story or set of beliefs are mistaken to be true due to how consistent it's been set-up.) and Earned Dogmatism Effect (whenever self-perceptions of experience back by accomplishments increases close-minded cognition.). At worst, the dogmatist is so steadfast in their belief system they don't realize they've been deceived. The amount of mistakes a dogmatist can make are un-contained; the dogmatist thinks he's actually smart and informed, but rarely stops to think and realize that they made a mistake. In the worst-case scenario, they'll double down on their beliefs in a way that makes their own actions prove their beliefs. This also  the Halo Effect

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How the African (Black) Race has fallen into degeneracy

Image
  Most Black people are currently puppets of the Jew, and they don't realize it either. This is a thumbnail for a reason. Hitler warned White people about Jews. Malcolm X warned Black people about Jews. What does that say to both races?  “No black man or woman becomes a multi millionaire, without friendship in the Jewish Community. Nearly all prominent black actors and musicians, have had Jewish Sponsors. -Oprah -Jay Z -P Diddy  -Cab Calloway  Just keep naming em” - Louis Farrakhan   "The greatest downfall of the African people will be not being able to differentiate Europeans from Jews ." - Prof. Tony Martin   “ Jews believe in censorship more than anybody else…They can’t take any criticism…they don’t like you talking about them but they wanna talk about everybody else…” - Malcolm X   " Jews had been involved in the African and other slave trades, for a very long period of time." -   Prof. Tony Martin  "The Jews were the major slave tra...
Read more

Screenshots and photos exposing the Jews, the Abrahamic religions, and their tactics

Image
The second commenter on this screenshot explains how Jews fooled everyone with Christianity:    This Twitter post not only proves that the difference between Zionism and Judaism are redundant, but Jews would still control the governments of the Nations around the world anyway.       One of the replies to the above post explain why all Jews won't go to Israel and control other governments like the US, Europe and Asia:       This user explains why Christianity and Jesus are Jewish, and how Christians fall for the "Jesus is a gentile" myth. The same Twitter user reposted Dinesh D'Souza's post, giving more evidence on why Jesus was a Jew. This is explicitly written in the Bible itself.  Twitter user Daniel Jones brings up the Vatican and indirectly points out how that organization benefits the Jews:       The post that might've lead to the Uncensored AI account on Twitter/X getting censored and suspended:   ...
Read more

Why Leaving Religion Out Of Politics Backfired in the long run

  Punishments in response to witch-hunts and heresy were the norm in the Middle Ages (especially during the Inquistion, when Christians conquered Spain and areas surrounding it). After the resistance successfully fought back against the tyranny of the Christian theocracy, the people thought it would be a good idea to leave religion out of political and legal affairs. In its early stages, this worked out as intended throughout the late 17 th Century and early 18 th Century. One would think this is a net positive, but the Jews and their Abrahamic offshoots observed this choice from the shadows and capitalized on it; no more witch hunts, no more public torture (and any other kind of punishment, for that matter) in response to heresy, and no more forced conversions to Christianity.  Publicly at least... However, the Abrahamic cults knew they needed to be more subtle (or at least divert attention away from religion influencing politics) if they were to regain dominance. Knowi...
Read more